Montreal Canadiens
Jake Evans Trade & Contract Talk: Finding Comparable Contracts
Montreal Canadiens forward Jake Evans is in an excellent position from a career standpoint. Not only is he a versatile, hard-working centre, he’s also in the midst of his most productive season, quite the blessing for an impending free agent.
According to Pierre LeBrun, Evans is the type of player teams such as the New Jersey Devils are looking to acquire, which isn’t particularly surprising, though we should note that Renaud Lavoie has suggested both Evans and the Habs are interested in a contract extension, complicating a situation that already required a healthy amount of due diligence before moving forward.
The last time we discussed the Evans dossier, I was quick to point out his shooting percentage, which was verging on 33 percent. In other words, Evans, who usually scores on fewer than 10 percent of his shots, was tripling his career average in shooting efficiency, a considerable red flag when evaluating the value of extending a forward.
With all due respect to Evans, signing a 28-year-old player after they experienced an unsustainable improvement in the shooting department often leads to the player become an albatross from a salary-cap perspective, a cardinal sin for a general manager navigating the choppy waters of a salary-cap bound sports landscape.
To put a fine point on the risk involved, Evans’ all-situations shooting percentage has dropped to 28.6 percent in 2025, which is still incredibly high. Consequently, he’s been kept off the scoresheet in the last four games. It’s a good reminder that we’re not trying to be mean when pointing to the shooting percentage as a potential issue.
That’s why a trade may be the best way forward.
With that in mind, even with the dip in shooting, Evans is still on pace to score 21 goals and 27 assists in an 82-game prorated season, far and away his best output since joining the team in 2019-20. That number is likely to drop, but for now, we’ll use it as a baseline to establish how much Evans may be able to command as an unrestricted free agent.
Jake Evans Mock Arbitration Hearing
If we treat this like an arbitration hearing, one of the least enjoyable experiences for both athletes and general managers (but more so for the former than the latter), we can establish a few key points that would be studied when attempting to gauge Evans’ value.
Both groups would present comparable contracts in the NHL, while also keeping tabs on things such as age, and health. Of course, they’ll also point to the player’s production, though they don’t simply focus on one season, as it rarely presents a clear picture of the expected offensive impact.
In this case, Kent Hughes and Co. would probably argue Evans is closer to a 30-point player than a 50-point player when keeping other seasons in mind. He’d also likely explain that at 28 years old, the upcoming contract would have to take under consideration that most players peak between 23 and 28. Finally, the last topic management could bring up in favour of keeping the contract cost low is Evans’ underlying numbers, which have been far from impressive. The quick counterargument would be bringing up his usage, which is far from a situation that’s conducive to producing strong shot control stats.
As for the other camp, they’d establish Evans’ value to the Canadiens beyond his solid fourth-line production. Not only does Evans play an important role on the penalty kill, he’s a trustworthy centre who has a penchant for scoring big goals when his team needs it the most. Thus, even if he doesn’t have a letter on his chest, Evans should still be considered a player who leads by example. He’s also a home-grown talent, so to speak, and there are very few examples of drafted players emerging from the Canadiens’ AHL affiliate over the course of the last couple of decades. In that sense, he defied the odds in a situation that was clearly not conducive to developing NHL players.
Great individual effort by Jake Evans to score a shorthanded goal and make it 5-2 #GoHabsGo pic.twitter.com/a9V9ZuV1eD
— Marc Dumont (@MarcPDumont) April 3, 2024
Jake Evans Contract Comparables
If we assume Jake Evans will re-ignite his scoring touch and finish the season with 48 points, and then combine it with his production last year of 28 points, it gives us an average 82-season scoring pace of 38 points over the course of two years. That will be the number we will use to find players who signed a contract extension in the same situation.
The important thing to monitor when comparing contracts is not the annual average value (AAV), but rather the percentage of the salary cap involved at the time of signing the deal, because the salary cap is constantly changing. Therefore, a player who signed for five percent of the salary cap in 2020 is actually making less than five percent once the salary cap goes up in the following years.
By keeping an eye on the percentage of the salary cap, we’ve been able to come quite close to predicting the range of various Canadiens contracts, including Cole Caufield’s eight-year extension., as well as Alex Newhook’s four-year extension.
It’s a little more complicated in Evans’ case, as most comparable players signed a contract at a much earlier age, closer to 22 or 23 years old. That eliminates many of the potential contracts that would normally serve as examples of what to expect.
There are three players who come to the forefront if we attempt to keep age in the equation: Brett Howden, Evan Rodrigues, and Frederick Gaudreau. Howden was a little younger when he signed, but he produced less than Evans in the previous two years. Rodrigues was a little older, but he produced more than Evans in the previous two years. Gaudreau was also slightly older, but he outproduced Evans in the two years leading up to his contract extension.
Howden’s contract, five years x $2.5 million AAV, accounted for 2.85 percent of the salary cap, while Rodrigues’ deal, four years x $3 million, was 3.6 percent, and finally, Gaudreau took up 2.5 percent with his five year, $2.1 million AAV cap hit.
We have to remember playing in Montreal is not as financially advantageous from a tax perspective as it would be in Nevada, which leads me to suggest his overall cap hit will be closer to 3.5-4 percent of the total expenditures. I also don’t think the team is in position to demand a hometown discount, nor should Evans accept one, as this will be the only opportunity of his career to cash-in on unrestricted agency after a sudden uptick in scoring.
Montreal Canadiens and Jake EvansBrass Tacks
Seeing as the salary cap next season is expected to be $92.5 million, a 3.5 percent expenditure would be in the $3.25 million AAV range, while a four percent expenditure would be closer to $3.7 million AAV.
Whether that’s an acceptable number for either party remains to be seen, and term always comes into play, as it provides a little insurance for players who are expected to decline in the final years of their contracts.
Offering Evans a long-term deal would surely bring down the AAV, but it would also carry the risk of adding an albatross contract to the books, the exact type of situation general manager Kent Hughes must avoid if the Canadiens are to maintain enough salary cap space to add important elements to the lineup once the team is ready to compete.
All Jake Evans and NHL contract information via Puck Pedia.
3M is as high as I’m going, reluctantly. At 28 he won’t be expected to improve on his numbers. Good for him but if he wants more I’ll take the decent return
Normally, I’d agree, that’s the max I’d spend, but he’ll get more on the open market, no doubt about it, and he probably deserves it, too.
It really depends on what he wants. if he is willing to do 3ish for 3 to 4 years because he wants to stay in Montreal then sign him. If he wants to max cash/term and doesn’t care where he does it then he is likely gone.
Though I like Evans I haven’t always been a huge fan. When I’d see him shoot the puck into the corner on a rush I would say, Evans, that’s where offence goes to die. I have liked him a lot more lately, he always plays hard and he is good defensively, but, depending on term I don’t think he deserves more than 3.25 million. I don’t think Hughes will open the vault for him and if some other team offers something great for him he will be gone. On the open market some team (depending on how he finished the season, but if he gets 21 goals and 48 points) will give him four and a half for four years.
I think Evans is in the calibre defensively as Danault. He may play on the fourth line, but his face off wins in all aspects of the game plus his pk aptitude is well worth 2.5 to 3 million over 3 years.
He wants to stay, and is constantly showing his worth.
At age 28 Paul Byron after two seasons of 22 goals and 20 goals, Marc Bergevin rewarded Paul with a 4 year contract at 3.4 million dollars per season. Although well deserved, in retrospect because of all the injuries Paul had, a two year contract would have been a better option. Perhaps I am comparing apples to oranges, but there is no guarantee that a four year contract will age well for a full 4 years.
I like that comparison much more than the Danault comparison I keep seeing everywhere.
I often compare him to Lehkonen, in that it almost feels he could fit higher in the lineup if given a chance.
a right shot center that kills penalties and wins faceoffs – if we want to stay in the mix this year and we want to make a run as soon as next year, we keep Evans… he wants to stay, a 3-4 year deal between 3 and 3.5 will keep him a Hb, no doubt about it… Dvo needs to go, Evans needs to stay 😉
PS – I’m not worried about the career offense being unsustainable, his true value is in his defensive game, his leadership, and simply adding depth down the middle (a spot we are still weak)…
I agree, it’s Dvorak, that offence killing pylon that needs to go. With Evans centering Anderson and Gallagher, that would be a tough line to play against. With Dvorak, it needs help from the d and big efforts from his linemates to get any goals. Look how terrible the 4th line was with him in the middle. I think if we have a chance to get rid of him and upgrade there that we could make the playoffs this year. With him on the team, there’s a big hole in the bottom 6. The trade for Carrier showed how much of a difference changing out one player can make, so I hope it gets done. No more helping out old clients though, Hughes–Colin White was maybe the worst waiver pickup in team history, 0 pts on 2 teams over 40+ games. Maybe league history.
We tend to over value our players. Evan’s stock will never be higher, trade him now.
We have players in the minors just like him or better ready to step in.
Yea just like lekhonen…
Exactly. Some players are really hard to replace.
I’ve already seen too many of them get traded by the Habs in my lifetime!!
I’ve been a vocal supporter of Evans for years, but under no circumstances should we not trade him. He’s the most valuable he’ll ever be right now and we must capitalize on that. If the numbers are advantageous to us, we could always try to sign him back in the summer, but I wouldn’t hold my breath on that one. I love the guy, but he’s gotta go.
Problem with trading a super reliable player is that you have to replace him.
Plus the return doesn’t always pan out. Look at the Lehkonen trade…
Absolutely. There’s a risk. However, this is not the Jake Evans we’re going to get moving forward. He’s having a career year and his shooting percentage is off the charts. There’s zero chance he maintains it through the next contract, let alone even this season. I hated the Lehkonen trade too, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make trades for the fear of something similar happening again. Now, if Evans is willing to sign a very team friendly contract, my opinion changes. But, since that’s extremely unlikely, trading him is the approach we need to take. I actually think we should trade Evans and Armia as a pair to increase the return. They have excellent chemistry and would automatically make up 2/3 of an excellent 4th line and all off a PK duo for a Cup contender. That holds enough worth to get us a 1st round pick to use as an asset. And don’t forget, trading Evans doesn’t mean we couldn’t possibly resign him on July 1st (especially if we have a handshake deal with him when we move him at the TDL).
Good one.! Getting rid of Armia as well as Evans.
In an ideal world, he signs 3-4 years right around the $3M mark.
But realistically, if anyone reading this would find themselves in his position, would they trade potentially $1M per year and an extra 1-2 years of term to remain a Hab?
I love the guy and I hope he stays. But I’ll completely understand if he chooses to get paid instead. This is his moment.
I think he should be happy if he gets $3.5 million per, but i also think if he gets that much, it should be a 3-5 year deal at most. Last thing we need is another player being severely overpaid in our bottom 6. Our 3rd line–I call it the Bergevin 3–makes over $22 mil in actual salary, and is being outscored by the 4th line big time. Luckily, Dvorak will finally be gone by July at latest. If Hughes even tries to re-sign that pylon he should get the old Archie Slap (RocknRolla, for those wondering what the Archie Slap is).
They gave Newhook a 4 year extension!? My gawd how sick(in a bad way) is that!
If his cap hit is less than 3 million per season, that means he is very tradeable. Sign him and trade him if and when the situation demands it. Once Beck is ready and Hage close to the show, then trade him. Why overcomplicate things?