Connect with us

Montreal Canadiens

Canadiens In Unique Spot Heading Into NHL Trade Deadline

Published

on

Montreal Canadiens GM Kent Hughes

The Montreal Canadiens have a plan and it looks like they’re going to be sticking to it, no matter where they are in the standings.



Despite playing well above their expected finish, at least according to NHL betting odds, the Canadiens are still very much in a rebuild, with the best still yet to come.

If Matvei Michkov‘s performances for Philadelphia are any indication, young phenom, Ivan Demidov, is likely to come in next season and shake things up even further.

This all while youngsters like Lane Hutson, Kaiden Guhle, Emil Heineman, Owen Beck, Jakub Dobes and more continue to develop on the main roster over the next 12 months.

But they’re still not quite there yet, as their quality depth at centre and on the right side of their defense, the two hardest positions to fill in hockey are still under league average.

The Canadiens are aware of this, and want to accumulate more assets in order to perform those big trades this summer, with so much money coming off the books. However, based on chatter across the league, they aren’t looking to speed up or later their planning as it pertains to their pending free agents.

It’s a trap that the Nashville Predators fell into last season that could easily become the fate of the Canadiens if they mismanage the next few months.

Why The Montreal Canadiens Should Avoid The Nashville Predators’ Deadline Strategy

The Montreal Canadiens are currently chasing a playoff spot.

If that were to happen, it would be great news for the Canadiens, but not a sign that they should hold onto every player in hopes of a strong playoff run.

Getting the young core a taste of the NHL playoffs would be a bonus, but that shouldn’t come at the expense of their rebuild; a part of their plan GM Kent Hughes has mentioned he wanted to stick to.

The Nashville Predators were in the same predicament last season, where they had a significant amount of pending free-agents on the roster that needed to be either signed or traded, while holding down a playoff spot.

They chose to forgo trading Tommy Novak and Alex Carrier, signing both to three-year deals, but ultimately chose to move Yakov Trenin.

One year later, they ended up trading Carrier for Justin Barron; a deal that looks pretty lopsided at the moment, given Carrier’s underlying numbers. The Predators have also been reported to be making Novak available on the trade market, as they look to improve their depth down the middle in their top 6.

Both players could have returned significant hauls at last year’s trade deadline, with returns going as high as 1st or 2nd round picks.

Instead, Nashville sought to hold onto their pending free agents, and even add the likes of Anthony Beauvillier and Jason Zucker to their lineup; en route to a 1st-round exit.

Taking this surprising success as a sign of things to come, and not a circumstance of an abnormally weak Western Conference, GM Barry Trotz went on a spending spree during the 2024 offseason and completely shellacked the Predators’ team chemistry.

Now, they’re capped out, NHL GMs are waiting for them to make a (another) mistake, and they’ll have to pay through the nose to fix their situation this season.

 

Weighing The Pros and Cons

The Canadiens find themselves in a bit of a better situation from Nashville, as most of their core is young and locked in long-term.

Like Nashville last season, Montreal has a few pending free-agents that are peaking right as their contracts end, like Jake Evans, Joel Armia and, to a lesser extent, David Savard.

They currently find themselves knocking on the door of a playoff berth after pulling themselves out of last place in the NHL standings not two months ago.

But, unless Jake Evans is willing to sign a hometown discount on the long-term for under $3.5M, or a top defenceman sustains a major injury, then Evans and Savard will likely get a ton of attention come NHL Trade Deadline; and the Canadiens will likely be listening in.

Evans has been one of the biggest surprises in the NHL this season. After posting 28 points last season, just one point shy of his career best 29 points, Evans is on pace to score over 50 points this season, while being one of the top penalty-killers in the game.

This, on top of being a right-shot centre; one of the rarest commodities in the NHL.

The more he continues to play well, the better the chances of him not only asking for more money become, but also the more this value will increase; potentially bringing in a 1st-round pick.

For a player like David Savard, who is 34 and in the final years of a solid career, maximizing his value now, especially after the Carrier trade, would be wise. But Evans is an entirely different animal, as he’s in his prime at 28 years old.

But, despite his offensive coming out party, Evans’ offence doesn’t look to be particularly sustainable on the long-term, as he’s currently scoring at a 28.3% success rate; which is well above the league average of 12-13%. It means that he’s likely due to regress back down to 30-35 points as soon as next season.

Evans would be in his right to ask for upwards of $4M, given his season and contract comparables across the league; however, Renaud Lavoie reports that both sides are interested in getting a deal done. That likely means that a more team-friendly deal is coming, as Evans is looking to stay in Montreal.

That changes the dynamic.

Montreal Canadiens Biding Their Time

Evans and Savard, who both currently occupy bottom-six/bottom-pair roles, could likely get premium assets to improve clear positions of need down the line (Number 2 centre, top-pair/Top-4 Right-shot defenceman), which could be just as valuable as retaining them.

What makes this process even more interesting is that the organization has not yet begun significant contract talks with either camp as of the writing of this article, despite the Canadiens and Evans having mutual interest to talk contract. It would seem like they too are waiting to weigh the pros and cons of the market, like last season with Sean Monahan and David Savard.

They were able to extract a 1st-round pick from the Winnipeg Jets for Monahan and jumped at the opportunity, while setting a price for Savard and choosing to hold onto him when teams balked at the extra year on his contract.

The Montreal Canadiens, who likely want to put the bulk of their cap dollars at the top of their lineup, won’t look to retain any of their free agents if it’s not advantageous to them from a contractual perspective. Thus, if Evans’s camp is able to sign a team-friendly deal, he’s likely going to stay put, as it would provide more value to the team long term than a late 1st-round pick.

However, if he were to go above 3.5M in asking, things may get a little dicey for the long-time Canadiens center, and may force the Canadiens to weight their options on the trade market.

They have a plan, and it would be surprising if they don’t stick to it. But, like the Carrier trade, they may not to effectively weaken their club too much, as to not hurt their goal of remaining in the playoff mix.

 

*For more NHL betting lines and futures, head over to FanDuel

19 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Niko

The team has solidified its 1st, 3rd and 4th lines. The 2nd line is starting to turn the corner and may develop into a legitimate threat by year end. Technically speaking you would have all the ingredients to surprise. Realistically, Dvorak, Savard and Armia will more likely not be part of the Team in the summer. These are KEY veterans that will be replaced with younger rookies Beck, Demidov, Roy and Maillioux. Rookies make mistakes and require seasoning. The schematics of a rebuild resemble the volatile nature of the stock market. There will be a significant setback next year and being in the mix will no longer be a viable and realistic goal.

GHG55

It just seems so short sighted to keep them…. I really hope they move on unless it’s like 3×3 for Evans (it won’t be, he’ll get more elsewhere).

There’s wayyy too much of a roller coaster in this market.
They lose a few games at the start of the year despite 2 season of getting younger AND earning more points: “FIRE EVERYONE! TRADE EVERYONE!”
They win a few games despite only being in the 3rd full season of a rebuild with most prospects not on the team yet: “WE’RE CONTENDERS! RE-SIGN THAT FOURTH LINE GUY ON AN UNSUSTAINABLE TEAR FOR 5X5!!”

Relax and stick to the plan. Most of our top prospects haven’t even played 15 Nhl games COMBINED (Demidov, Hage, Reinbacher, Mailloux, Fowler, Engstrom, Beck, kapanen etc). I don’t want the pain of the last couple years to be for nothing. Do it right. The article perfectly outlines what the team still needs and why picks/prospects are important. They can either turn into those pieces directly, or be used in a trade. The whole “we don’t need more futures” is absurd.

Please trade them…. I’d much rather a 1st rd pick that we can use in a trade for a surefire 1RD than a 28 Evans on an unsustainable tear…

And as I’ve said before, the whole “we have to start winning some time!”…. I’ll remind you most of our prospects aren’t in the league yet. The expectations shouldnt be that the rebuilding team starts winning BEFORE their prospects make the show

Last edited 14 days ago by GHG55
morrisk

This is a real tough one. If your team is knocking on the playoffs door, after how many seasons of futility, I say you go for it…and give these young players a taste of this. And especially if they make it in. You can’t embrace the tank forever…training wheels must come off at some point…

I’m not saying be buyers at the TDL. No to that. I just don’t think anyone who CAN be traded should be traded. Sometimes, the best trade is the one not made.

Evans is off the trade blocks no matter what. So what if he “regresses” down to 30-something pts per season…that’s still worthy of being on the 4th or even 3rd line. And what if he attains 40 something pts? A multi year deal at $4M per is perfectly fine.

Dvorak must go…he doesn’t fit. Get what you can for him (say 3rd rd pick). I still say Anderson MUST go…now is the time. Don’t screw this up again and not trade him instead of Tofolli 2 years ago. If you can get a 2nd rd pick for him, fine.

Matheson and Savard are really tough now. Both are off their best paces from last season, but both have a hand the teams success right now. But they traded for Carrier last month, so he seems to be Savard’s replacement (right shot). So I’m ok with trading Savard, assuming a 2nd can come back.

Matheson is the really tough one. One one hand, neither ReinB or Mailloux appear ready to take a top six spot on the D. And if that continues for the rest of this season, then why not wait until next year to trade Matheson? However, it could be diminishing returns by next season, like waiting too long to trade Anderson, and he would fetch a 1st rd pick in exchange…so why not trade him this season? The Habs would have three 1st rd picks, which could be packaged for a very high 1st rd pick, or a bigtime star. I’m on the fence and could go with either plan.

Last edited 14 days ago by morrisk
GHG55

“ You can’t embrace the tank forever…training wheels must come off at some point…” I’m sorry, I just don’t understand people who say stuff like this. This is only the 3rd full season of the rebuild, it really hasn’t been that long, especially compared to other rebuilds. And as I’ve said in several comments, Demidov, Reinbacher, Hage, Beck, Kapanen, Mailloux, Fowler, Engstrom, Dobes, Mesar, Konyushkov… they have less than 15 games of nhl experience COMBINED! Why are you expecting the team to be winning BEFORE their prospects majority of their prospects even make the nhl?!?! This is SO strange to me. Only TWO players that we’ve drafted since the rebuild started have made it to the nhl on a permanent basis: Slaf and Hutson. Yes we still had a couple young players, but every rebuild does. It just doesn’t make any sense at all to expect a full rebuild to be that successful that quickly.

The sens, sabres and red wings have all been rebuilding for more than twice as long.

The leafs missed the playoffs 10/11 years before they started making it consistently, and they had to luck into a player who has the trajectory to break the all time goals record, AND earn selke consideration, as well as elite players like Marner and nylander, plus a premier free agent like Tavares.

Oilers missed playoffs 12/13 seasons, and had 4 1st OA picks, and lucked into McDavid, Draisaitl, and Bouchard

Colorado missed 6/7 seasons and lucked into Mack, Makar, and Rantanen

Tampa missed 5/6 and lucked into Stamkos, Kucherov, Hedman, Vasy, Point etc

Vegas is an obvious outlier due to the massive amount of assets they had as an expansion team

Carolina missed 11/12 seasons before consistent playoffs

Nj missed 9/10 and 10/12, got hischier and two Hughes bros and still haven’t made the playoffs in consecutive seasons

The kings missed the playoffs 6 straight seasons before they started making and won their 2 cups. Since that last cup, they’ve made playoffs 5/10 seasons but haven’t won a single round

Vancouver missed 7/8 years before they made it last year

I can keep going man. These things take time. I know it’s not fun but it reallllly looks like this patience and pain will pay off. Our timeline looks waayyyyyy better than almost all of these teams. We have to stop acting like this is some long, drawn out rebuild. It really, really isn’t. I know it’s been a long time since we won their cup, but look at the histories of these other teams I mentioned. Seriously, we’re in a very good spot relative to other rebuilds of both the past and present.

Steve

While it was a fluke Habs were in the Cup 3yrs ago. This will be the new regimes 4th draft. Two of there three top picks haven’t played a minute yet. It is still early in the rebuild. Having said that,Demidov could change the look of the top 6 drastically if he is what we hope he us. Habs could be dangerous next year. An overpay for a guy like Dobson would make the Habs very scary next year.

morrisk

Sorry, I’d rather win than tank again. I’d rather challenge for a playoff spot, and maybe even get it, than be mired at the bottom again with yet another #5 pick.

Habs still have plenty of upcoming draft picks, and even more if a couple more trades are made. There is no reason why there can’t be excitement for the current and near future with the continued improvement of the roster over time.

GHG55

On top of the other comment I have addressing your expected timeline, I don’t think your trade expectations are great either. Wanting to pay a career 4th liner $4M on a multi-year deal is modern hockey suicide. I outlined why in several other posts so I won’t rehash it. But Armia had one good stretch in the playoffs, got a bloated contract. Anderson had one good season, got a bloated contract. You simply don’t pay veteran players bigger contracts based on good performance in a small sample. Not if you expect to win in the cap era.

I also don’t understand how you apparently expect to start winning, but you’re fine if we replace all of Matheson, Savard, Armia, Dvorak, and Anderson. They are likely to be replaced by rookies (Reinbacher, Mailloux, Roy/kapanen, Beck, Demidov). Would you still be expecting them to win with that many more rookies on the team?

It’s very strange that you’re all about trading Anderson before his value drops, but you’re adamant about not trading Evans before his value drops. Especially since Evans is on an expiring contract which means we could lose him for nothing, AND he’s likely worth more in a trade than Anderson. I mean, I wanted Anderson traded a while ago, but I also don’t expect us to be winning yet, and I also want Evans traded so we don’t miss that value. You seem a bit all over the place, but perhaps I’m missing something.

morrisk

Happens ALL the time. FAs get bloated contracts based on one really good year. Scott Gomez?

Based on the current and projected cap for the next few years, a $4M x 3 year deal for a 28 yr old centre who can produce 30-something pts per season is NOT a bloated contract.

Tyrone

There’s always having your cake and eating it too. I feel we absolutely must trade Evans while his value is the highest it will ever be, but who says we can’t have a handshake deal with him to resign him in the summer as well?

Pete

Excellent article. The easiest thing in the world to do is to “make” a plan. The real challenge is to “stick to a plan”.

It seems like the owner, along with Gorton & Hughes are committed to doing this right. Organizations that get impatient and hasten their rebuilds often skip steps as they deviate from their plan.

The Habs’ fanbase is also showing collective patience, and by extension, their depth of hockey knowledge. In a 32 team league you simply can’t skip steps in a rebuild. Teardowns are relatively easy, but the real trick is in building it back up the right way. (Especially when it comes to Cap Management – ask any leaf fan what happens when you don’t.)

There will be missteps of course, but it’s all in the recovery. Turning Barron into Carrier, and giving the kid a fresh start, shows that they’re not too prideful to make realistic evaluations and manage accordingly.

While a rebuild guarantees nothing, rebuilding prudently with careful cap management is a must to building a contender. All things considered, I’ve never been more confident that the Habs have the right ownership, management and assets to contend for #25. It will be a lot of fun watching Montreal hockey now and in the years to come.

Bruce

Jake Evans averages 2 shots per game, second lowest on the team.
The volume of shots is very low, but the quality of his shots has been
excellent, albeit not sustainable, alas.

morrisk

this “not sustainable” thing is stupid. So maybe next season he “regresses” back to 30-something points…which is perfectly fine for a 3rd or 4th line centre!

Dana

With all the veterans, it’s necessary to have a solution for where they fit in if they stay and what impact does that have on developing a prospect. How do our players fit our plans and goals in the near, mid and long term horizons. You have to answer that otherwise you lose direction. Only so many roster spots available, planning requires projecting who slots in where. Naturally, you adapt and amend plans as required but the framework remains as it guides you towards the objective.

Owen Beck will be a better player than Jake Evans. He’s bigger, faster, more physical , better at faceoffs and projects to be a better offensive and defensive player. He’s got a lot of big game experience and has been hugely successful at rising to the occasion as his Memorial Cup MVP trophy attests. So don’t sign Jake,despite him being a good player having a career year, trade him at the height of his market value. Beck is ready and being here will drive his development forward.

In my view, this is the type of assessment (greatly condensed version here) and planning that needs to go into personnel decisions. Saying patience, patience, patience but never setting a timeline or any type of measurable goal is unviable. Patience could mean until the player or coach retires! . When it’s the go to solution, it’s fluff and problem avoidance and is a sign of management issues in my experiences as patience on it’s own with no plan is akin to procrastination and we all know how desirable that is in a competitive results driven environment

Steve

Evans and Savard have to go if they can fetch a 1st and a 2nd. Savard can come back next year as the 7th defenceman. He doesn’t want to move his family, he can fetch a 2nd rounder go to a contender and come home in the summer on a cheap deal. Year after that he is working for the team.

Dana

Win win. He’s getting close to retirement so that makes sense. You his agent, lol?

morrisk

Which is why you keep BOTH. Last I checked, Habs do not have centre depth, as Dvorak isn’t doing much. There is no guarantee Beck becomes any better than a 3rd line centre. When he is ready to come up, he should start on the 4th line and go from there. Evans is the perfect insurance policy…can play either 3rd or 4th line at least reasonably well. And just because he has one breakout year doesn’t mean he’s finished after it. Same happened with Lek when he got traded…and he got better.

We need to keep BOTH until the centre position becomes a logjam…if it ever does.

Last edited 13 days ago by morrisk
Dana

Suzuki, Dach, Dvorak, Hage. Beck, Kapanen, Newhook, all centers. Where does he fit in 18 months from now- Laval or press box?

Before this year Evans was a depth Center on a weak team, a fringe NhL player. Now he’s essential? Come on, he’s not a game changer. I like the guy, but he’s an interchangeable piece. 0 points with 3 shots in goal over the past 4 games so essentially very limited contributions and yet we won 3 of those games.

Trade him

Charles

The success of a rebuild depends on good management as well as many other things. One thing that can help a rebuild is unfavorable events that turn out to be blessings in disguise. For example last year it was discouraging that the team finished with only 76 points, but this turned out to be a blessing in disguise as it enabled the team to draft Demidov.

Chris O'Brien

Trade Matheson, he will bring a 1st.Savard is worthless, his flat footed.passes that are everywhere but the tape.Turns over the puck.