Habs Prospects
Canadiens Prospect Rankings: The Departed And Traded

The Montreal Canadiens 2025 Prospect Rankings are underway, but before we get going with the honourable mentions, as well as the in-depth articles for every prospect in the top-20, we’ll examine the important players who are no longer eligible for the project, either due to their age or a change in employers.
Lane Hutson Clause
Last year, we included prospects who were 23 or under, as long as they had played fewer than 100 games in the NHL. This time around, the parameters were set at 75 or fewer games, and if I’m being perfectly honest, Hutson played a significant role in the decision.
Hutson only has 84 games of experience under his belt, but you’d be hard-pressed to suggest he’s a prospect. He’s essentially already established himself as a legitimate top pairing defenceman.
If we kept him in the mix, it would be like allowing a Bugatti Veyron to be included in the local soap box derby.
Was it an arbitrary decision? Absolutely, but I’m not too worried we’ll have to bend the rules any more moving forward. Players who put together historic rookie campaigns are few and far between.
Montreal Canadiens Prospect Trades
Logan Mailloux was ranked 8th last year by the fans, making him the highest-ranking prospect who is no longer with the organization.
If I can be perfectly frank, the trade that saw the Canadiens acquire Zachary Bolduc from the St. Louis Blues was a great decision by Kent Hughes in terms of asset management. He used an area of strength to address a weakness, the ideal scenario for a rebuilding team that has to be a little more selective when it comes to trade targets.
Bolduc checks a lot of boxes for the Canadiens, and the team managed to maintain their youth movement, as both players included in the trade were just 22 years old.
INSTANT ANALYSIS: The Bolduc Trade Is Tidy Business By The Montreal Canadiens
The difference being that Bolduc has established himself as an NHL player, while Mailloux still has a lot of work to be done from a defensive perspective if he’s to carve out a permanent role with the Blues.
That being said, even if Mailloux is still an AHL player at this point in his career, we’d be delving into intellectual dishonesty by suggesting he brought nothing to the table while playing with the Laval Rocket. His shot selection is fantastic, he’s adored by his teammates due to his penchant for defending them whenever necessary, and he represented the Rocket in back-to-back years at the AHL All-Star weekend.
He’s also a right-handed defenceman, which means he automatically carries more value in the NHL.
All things considered, the trade had all the makings of a win-win decision, and it will be many years before we can close the chapter on the trade analysis for this particular deal.
Emil Heineman
It was a tale of two seasons for Emil Heineman, who was ranked 18th by Canadiens fans last season.
Prior to the unfortunate incident that led to being struck by a car while in Utah, the Canadiens had the best fourth line in hockey. Yes, Jake Evans was scoring on every second shot, and Joel Armia did his part, but statistically speaking, Heineman was the driving force behind their success. It’s no coincidence both Armia and Evans stopped producing the moment Heineman was no longer available to play on the fourth line. And it wasn’t just a matter of shooting percentages drying up, the underlying numbers down the stretch were below replacement.
He was used as the sweetener in the Noah Dobson trade, and very few Canadiens fans will lose sleep due to his departure, but there’s no doubt the Islanders acquired a very solid bottom-six player who tends to make something happen every shift, be it a hit, a shot, or a concerted defensive effort.
Justin Barron
Barron was another prospect who excelled in the offensive zone, but would have a hard time picking out his own goalie in a police lineup. And yet, despite his clear defensive woes, Barron was one of the few defencemen in Montreal who established a semiregular goal-scoring rate, part of the reason why Habs fans voted him as the 10th best prospect last year.
He also put together fantastic underlying numbers once he arrived in Nashville, which runs contrary to all the hot takes we saw on social media, which were essentially designed to lure Habs fans into bashing the former Canadiens defenceman after the trade, a lot like they did prior to the trade.
While it was true that Barron’s mistakes were difficult to forget, the factual evidence as to his value was much more nuanced.
Personally, I believe the vitriol sent his way was unreasonable, not to mention contrived. Barron finished second to Roman Josi in a bevy of key statistical categories in Nashville, while leading the entire Predators blue line in expected goals share (xGF%).
In other words, when he was on the ice, the Predators were a much better team.
The Graduates
Arber Xhekaj (9th) and Jayden Struble (12th) are the two main prospects beyond Hutson who are still with the team, but no longer qualify for our Montreal Canadiens prospect rankings.
After their baptism by fire in the NHL, both players had their fair share of peaks and valleys, and they also missed extended stretches while alternating as healthy scratches.
ON TOPIC: Projecting Montreal Canadiens Defensive Pairings Including Dobson
Fortunately, whenever the Habs allowed Xhekaj and Struble to play together on the third pairing the numbers were quite solid, and worth keeping in mind as the team prepares to establish their pairings heading into 2025-26.
All Montreal Canadiens statistics are via Natural Stat Trick.
If you are talking about our D as a whole, then I guess I can go along with the “dealing from a position of strength” point re: Mailloux/ Bolduc trade to a degree. However, I’d argue that RD is not a position of strength for us in the NHL (or even the pipeline now). We have Dobson long term in the NHL right now and that’s it. Carrier is more of a mid to short term guy for us in the NHL. But that’s it on the right side. We have Reinbacher in the pipeline as a good bet for the future, but he’s no sure thing quite yet. We HAD Kovacevic and Barron in the NHL, but they’re all gone now. We have 2 legit RD NHLers and 1 blue chip (hopefully) RD prospect so I would not call that deep enough to be deemed a position of strength, even when Mailloux is included. On the other hand (get it?) the left side could be called a position of strength, and I would have preferred that we dealt a LD instead of Mailloux, but I understand that was probably not what STL wanted.
(And just for the record, I was a big fan of Heineman and am quite disappointed to see him go. I also was a fan of Barron, but I’m a lot more patient than most fans, so I could live with his mistakes as he was developing. I was one of the few who did not like that trade when it happened. But, I’ve grown to appreciate the steadiness of Carrier that really helped out the D as a whole group last year. But I still would prefer if we had Barron, and even more so Kovacevic for that matter.)
TBH Reinbacher is much more likely to find a permanent role in the NHL than Mailloux. Reinbacher doesn’t score as many PP goals, but he can actually defend, and that means he won’t constantly get benched for his mistakes.
For all of Mailloux’s offensive skills, his defence was flat-out terrible. And that’s not an exaggeration. He still gives the puck up blindly ad nauseam, forgets he plays defence on a nightly basis, and rarely focuses on the important aspects of being a defender, such as defensive positioning and gap control.
And if I’m being even MORE honest, I actually have more trust in Engstrom playing his offside than Mailloux playing his natural position. He has more experience, is much more reliable, and has worked on his defensive issues, making them less of a significant drag on his overall impact, as well as his NHL potential.
Marc I attended a few Rocket playoff games and completely agree with your assessment of Mailloux and Engstrom. Mailloux was brutal during the Checkers series, while Engstrom was the best D on the ice for Laval. He made several great defensive plays on his offside. If there was place on the Left side, he would make the CH ahead of Reinbacher.
Ya, but how do you really feel? 😂
Do you think that’s all Mailloux will be though? Like Barron before him, I was willing to be patient with him. He missed a lot of development time with the pandemic shutdown and his personal growth issues. For me, he had top notch offensive skills, and just needed time to learn the defensive side.
I also felt wingers weren’t really a big need for us, so trading one of our best D prospects for an area that wasn’t deficient, maybe wasn’t the best use of our assets. I have nothing against Bolduc. I’m happy we have him, but I would much rather have preferred to move Struble + pick to get him. I think we gave up on Kovacevic, Barron and now Mailloux too soon. The fact that they’re all RD is also problematic for me. Other than maybe C, RD is our thinnest position in the pipeline imo.
You’re saying giving up an AHL rd for an NHL forward is a mistake?
That’s a reach! As Marc has stated numerous times, Engstrom has played on the right quite well already over his career and we have current left shot D that can play on the right.
Besides, once again, the Habs aren’t in “win now” mode, there are lots of other D prospects in the pipeline and Hughes is a good judge of trade value.
I liked the potential of Mailloux (and Barron, and liked the steadiness of Kovey) but if you relax and take a breath, the Habs NOW have DOBSON and BOLDUC in exchange for Heineman and Mailloux!!! Are you kidding me?!? WHAT could you POSSIBLY be complaining about unless you’re a “glass half empty” kind of guy!
Did you read my comments? No need to take a breath. I clearly stated I like Bolduc. I’m also aware that we have left handed D that can play on the right side, but that’s not what depth at a position means. It means having players playing their natural side. All my comment is saying is that I disagree with the comment that we “dealt from a position of strength for a position of weakness.” I feel we have plenty of wingers and after trading away 3 young RD, I’d say the pipeline is getting thin on that side compared to other positions. I’m happy we have Dobson, and I’m happy to have Bolduc. Btw, we traded away Heineman, Mailloux AND 2 first round picks to get them. You conveniently left that part out, especially when you yourself said we are not in “win now” mode. Two first round picks for a team still rebuilding is not an insignificant loss.
So I guess the St Louis Blues management must be complete incompetents. They must be. They took a dud off our hands, and in return gave us an elite power forward who some Montreal “writers” claim will score fifty goals next year. Or maybe, just maybe, St Louis Blues management is a better judge of hockey talent than fans who merely write about it.