Connect with us

Montreal Canadiens

More Emerging Montreal Canadiens 2024 NHL Draft Targets

Published

on

Top prospects for the 2024 NHL draft Montreal Canadiens

In a recent article, Marco D’Amico identified some emerging Montreal Canadiens draft targets.

With the standings solidified we now have a better sense of where Kent Hughes and his team will be selecting their new shiny toy.

That said, apart from a consensus number-one pick in Macklin Celebrini, trying to predict the order of the players selected in the top 10 is as impossible as avoiding potholes while driving on Quebec’s spring roads.

With that in mind, here’s a look at some other potential draft targets the Montreal Canadiens may be happy to nab on June 28.

Ivan Demidov

While it appears the Montreal Canadiens were shy to gamble on Matvei Michkov at last year’s draft, likely due to the so-called “Russian factor” and the uncertainties caused by the war in Ukraine, there’s a real possibility they face a similar dilemma, this summer.

Russian winger Ivan Demidov has been torching the MHL (Russia’s junior league) all year with 23 goals and 37 assists in 30 games and hasn’t cooled down in the playoffs. He currently has 15 goals and 11 assists in just 15 playoff games.

Regardless of the points total, the sheer display of dominance has been a treat to watch.

Demidov’s tantalizing stick handling, accurate shot, and dazzling edge work would make him the de facto best Montreal Canadiens forward prospect.

With one remaining year to his contract, he is not expected to re-sign in the KHL – making the jump to North America as soon as the 25/26 season. The fact he has been playing in the MHL, rather than the VHL or KHL, is likely a punishment for his intentions to jump ship on the first occasion.

So while his development path likely stagnates in the MHL next year – preventing him from facing top-notch competition and developing pro habits – the good news is he will reportedly gladly hop on the first plane to join his NHL team as soon as his contract expires.

It can be argued he’s the second-best forward prospect in this year’s draft, but will he be taken in the top five – or just outside, where the Montreal Canadiens could pounce on him?

Hard to tell.

Cole Eiserman

Touted as the potential number-one prospect at the start of the season, Eiserman’s slide through the rankings has been spectacular – and perhaps greatly exaggerated.

While he may not be the playdriver on his line – nor a defensive specialist, he’s a good skater with a solid frame at 6 foot, 196 lbs, who brings an invaluable skill in today’s game: goal scoring.

Let me re-phrase: goals galore!

Eiserman only trails Cole Caufield for the U.S. National Team Development Program’s most goals of all-time and for a single season, with 118 (to Caufield’s 126), also beating the likes of Austin Matthews for most goals in a season.

However, Eiserman played 12 fewer games and still finished with the same number of career points as Caufield (180).

Perhaps better defensive awareness, puck control, and puck management can be imparted to round out his game, but with the goal-scoring potential he has, these should be secondary things to worry about.

We don’t hear a lot about Alex Ovechkin’s defensive game, do we? Simply because he makes up for it the same way Eiserman could.

Artyom Levshunov / Zeev Buium

In Kent Hughes’ exit interview, he hinted that the priority would likely be to draft a forward with the pick they hold.

However, it isn’t impossible to imagine a scenario (although unlikely) where all the top forwards they covet are taken, and a legitimate top defender miraculously slides to their rank.

It’s unclear how the Montreal Canadiens front office appraises the ceiling of all their current defensive prospects and players, but they could legitimately feel they have a slew of potential number two to four defencemen without a clear-cut, bonafide number one prospect in the pipeline.

No disrespect to Kaiden Guhle, David Reinbacher, or Lane Hutson, but it’s possible this management group would view Artyom Levshunov or Zeev Buium as more complete players with higher upside.

Levshunov (6’2, 209 lbs, RD) is ranked as the top defenceman of this draft by many, and the brilliance of Buium (6′, 183 lbs, LD) in high-profile events such as the World Juniors, and more recently at the NCAA’s Frozen Four, has seen his stock rise.

Both play in the NCAA, where Levshunov (Michigan State) tallied 35 points in 38 games, whereas Buium (Univ. of Denver) notched 50 points in 42 contests, en route to the NCAA championship.

They’re both highly skilled puck movers with elegant skating strides, fantastic mobility, natural offensive flair, abilities, and high-end hockey acumen.

For the Montreal Canadiens’ management, drafting a top-end defenceman could make it easier to trade another one for a young forward. We recently saw the Anaheim Ducks take advantage of this strategy, as they flipped defenceman Jamie Drysdale for blue chip centerman, Cutter Gauthier.

Could the Habs be tempted to employ the same approach?

21 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
William O'Neill

Totally agree with the idea of possibly drafting a defenceman strategy. The team has their draft board. Stick to it. Best player available whatever the position.

Dana

There are enough elite forward prospects to eliminate the possibility of needing to draft a defender

I’m very optimistic about the forwards. If they take Demidov then we have taken the most exciting player option- highlight reel like Hutson up front. Lindstrom is the beast up the middle, a power forward with elite skill. Eiserman is the goal scoring machine and iginla is the winger version of Lindstrom- does it all while being a very hard guy to play against. Catton would be a huge win as well, a play driver with sick skills that wants the puck on his stick and is equally comfortable shooting or passing.

What player type would you take knowing what they bring to the table and what we already have and need going forward? Bure, Messier, Hull , Iginla or Sakic? Please do not think I’m suggesting those are the careers I’m projecting, I’m not. I’m delineating the player types, and admittedly with flaw. I think all of them will be good, which type do we take? This is when it’s true that there are no wrong answers.

John Smith

Well said Dana. Further to your points, aside from Celebrini, this has to be one of the foggiest drafts I’ve ever experienced. It also is the most pivotal. Montreal is unlikely going to draft 5-7th for a long time. It has to get things right this year.

Dana

Thanks John. There has been a lot of movement in the rankings since September. Only celebrini has maintained his spot, and Demidov has been top 3 consistently in most lists. We didn’t get it right last year so we absolutely must win at the draft table this year.

I’m hoping for another trade for a high potential forward this off season but it’s not mission critical as we can sign a ufa or make a similar trade next year. The other option is we trade down the draft board this year or next to get another forward. I identify our needs as we head towards cup contention in a few years as 2 top 6 forwards with at least one being elite.

Tyrone

Normally heading into a draft I usually have my heart set on 1 or 2 players I really hope we get. But, this year, it’s not so much a specific player, as it is a specific position. For me, it HAS to be a forward. If we pick a Dman, I’m gonna puke. Of course, if Bettman coyly states, “We have a trade to announce…” immediately before or after we select a Dman, that involves us sending one of our Dmen elsewhere in a blockbuster trade like the Dach/Romanov scenario, then I might be convinced to hold the chunks in. Or, even better, Bettman makes the announcement before the first pick and we’ve flipped Reinbacher and our 5th overall pick to San Jose for the #1 pick (assuming the draft order hasn’t changed). Now that would be something to celebrate.

John Smith

I totally agree with you Tyrone. Failure to land a quality forward would be devastating. I like your trade idea- though Reinbacher is a minute munching defenseman. Losing him would be a major loss. He may not rack up points but he will stop the opposition from scoring goals.

John Smith

This summer the tandem of HuGo have two things to do. Draft a high end forward, ideally a centre who can play the wing and likewise pull a Romanov and trade for a similar forward. It is my belief that you can never have enough centres as they can be converted to wingers with the added ability to fill in during injuries.

Tyrone

We have to give to get, so we have to sacrifice something significant. Considering the sheer wealth of D prospects/players we have, I don’t think we’ll miss him.

Here’s another thought… Arizona really wanted Reinbacher last year when we took him right before they were going to grab him. How about we trade Reinbacher for the “Coyotes” 6th pick this year, and we grab TWO forwards at the draft?

John Smith

Me likely. Some outside the box thinking is necessary. Opposing GMs will be smelling blood as Hughe’s playing hand is exposed. A conventional trade that pushes the Canadiens into contender status would likely involve Montreal having to offer up more.

John Smith

One thing to keep in mind though is that no one that Montreal picks, except perhaps if they win the Celebrini lottery, is going to be online by next year. The two picks in your great idea will likely be good in 3-4 years. So, if Hughes does what you suggest, he will need Monahan like place holders while the mortar cures. This can be done via expensive free agency or by trades. A Reinbacherless Montreal Canadiens would still have some excess defensemen and Winnipeg’s pick. I prefer the latter as it might land the Habs another Dach or Newhook.

Billy739

Nothing in Hughes history suggests thats a possibility.
Remember Hoffmans unmovable contract? Gone
How ? By getting paid to be part of a 3 team trade
We profited on Petry twice while moving out Hoffmans contract.

I mean really its most likely he takes Silayev or Levshunov IF Demidov, Lidstrom and Iginla are gone. Buium’s great but moving a RD like Mailloux or Reinbacher to make room for Either player works for MTL. Levshunov is more of a immediate addition with 1-2 years while Silayev is like gonna be in Russia another 3-4 years developing his game after his 17 year old Rookie KHL season this year. He’d be coming over at the same type as Captain Konyskov rounding out MTL’s RD Longterm.

He could Easily use Reinbacher who’s hit the ground running in the AHL and helped anchor Laval into the final spot for the Playoffs since joining. Now joined by Struble and Barron on Defense the Laval Dcore looks Stacked and has a lot of Size. This good Run couldnt have come at a better time for Reinbacher or Hughes

The only one that handcuffs us really is Buium
He’s about a year out from being ready before his NCAA title run where he stepped up big in the playoffs. Some could argue he’s ready now which doesnt work for MTL’s timeline or provide a trade flexibility. RD on the other hand Silayev would be Perfect timeline wise and a 6’7 Mobile D is a worthy investment

Dana

Your model only slightly improves our blue line that already projects to be very good based on Guhle Hutson Reinbacher Mailloux and Xhekaj plus 5/6 other candidates including Engstrom and Bogdan Konyuskov who was taken a few picks after Florian last year plus the other 5 guys vying for roles today

What your recommendation doesn’t do is address the lack of top 6 forwards on the roster required to compete for a Cup. The option of moving a dman for a forward does nothing for me as why go through all the effort and complications unnecessarily?? The organizational energy it uses to do that- draft, develop, and trade- is betttr spent elsewhere. Identify the need, draft accordingly. And at the top of tge board there is not bpa consensus as verifiable by looking at the final draft lists from the dozen or do professional scouting organizations. And you don’t even mention Zayne P, not that I entertain drafting a defenseman to play in the organization.

Sorry, the clubs need is 2 top 6 forwards and delaying selecting one immediately pushes the time it takes to get to cup contender status back unnecessarily

Alex

That way of thinking is what made us draft KK instead of Tkachuk. No more please. Draft BPA then trade for a forward.

Its easy to get a forward when you’re dangling a young future top 4 defenseman. Build with the best defenseman and trade those that doesn’t fit the model of team your tryna build.

Last edited 11 days ago by Alex
Tony m

Then trade the pick for.a top foward and save.ourselves a couple of years of development.

morrisk

Your distain for Reinbacher has been well chronicled. But just because you hated that pick doesn’t mean he’s getting “flipped”. He’s not. They wouldn’t draft him at #5, then flip him for a loss…because this season has been a setback, so to speak. He would not be worth a #5 now.

Regardless, NO WAY SJ accepts our #5 + Rein for Mak. Add double that and they MAY consider the offer. But NO WAY Hugo offers up that for Mak…I don’t know why you keep fishing in this wishing well. If you are convinced that if we land Mak no way we trade him for a haul, then by transitivity, no other team landing him at #1 would trade him for a haul either. We NEED one or two dynamic wingers…we don’t NEED Mak.

The most likely scenario is we take our forward at #5 – #7, then flip our later 1st rd pick (plus?) for another Dach/Newhook type deal.

Tyrone

You sure spend a lot of time jumping on other people’s ideas that are here just for fun. You do realize that none of us actually think any of this is going to happen, right? I don’t think for a second that they’d trade Reinbacher. These are all just alternative ideas that differ from the same old stuff that just gets regurgitated over and over. It’s basically, wouldn’t it be cool if they did this…

About the only accurate statement in your diatribe is the fact that I (along with just about every other Habs fan on the planet) was disappointed we took a defenceman instead of a forward last season. I’m in total agreement that we’ll pick a forward with our pick and swap the WPG pick with something else for another forward just like they’ve done the past 2 drafts, but it’s fun to just spitball ideas. Well, it’s fun until someone takes things way too seriously and feels the need to respond negatively all the time to people’s comments. My stance is the + 0 – function on this and other sites shouldn’t even exist. Who cares how many people like/dislike another person’s opinion? You seem to be the only person who actually —‘s comments. Life is too short to waste time throwing negativity into the world.

DomKing

I agree that Habs may pull off a trade to get two forwards instead of one. Winnipeg’s pick plus one of our young D could get them another top eight pick. Remember, Romanov alone got us the Islanders’ 13th overall pick. Even Calgary’s 2025 1st round pick could be in play. Walking away with Eiserman and either Lindstrom or Iginla would be bonkers.

Greg

Hughes took a defenceman last year when anyone could tell you we needed elite talent up front far more, what’s to stop him doing it twice? A lot of people seem to think Habs will be much better next year when Dach is healthy, and the top players are all that much better. I’m not so sure. They don’t just need more scoring, though that is where they are weakest, they need to tighten things up on d as well. It’s a mess out there, structurally.

Last edited 9 days ago by Greg
Tony m

Looks like last year’s pick was a.great.move as.this year as.tempting as picking a.D may be we don’t need one.Many of the D men this year seem to be very good but will they make the NHL? Reinbacker will be an NHLer. which made him a great choice. Bonus with all the good D available this year we can pick a solid foward. It’s unlikely that all of them will be picked by the 6 th round. At worst either Lindstrom or Iginla will be a Hab , either will be a great addition.
the other possibility is to trade up to a team that needs D men and trade Mailloux and switch picks.

Tony m

Liindstom should be their first choice, he is big center shoots an d passes well , Iginla is swinger and you can always trade for a winger more easily than a center

Peter

Kaiden Guhle > Artyom Levshunov or Zeev Buium
not even close