Montreal Canadiens
Canadiens Kent Hughes Discusses Trades, Contracts, Slafkovsky
Montreal Canadiens general manager Kent Hughes held his annual mid-season press conference on Wednesday, discussing several important topics, including how he expects the team to approach the NHL’s trade deadline, contract-extension talks, Juraj Slafkovsky’s development, Ivan Demidov’s play in Russia, and more.
Before we get going, I’d like to point out Hughes has done a fantastic job when it comes to his French language skills. Even though he was born in Montreal and had the ability to speak French prior to taking over as the general manager, it’s a very difficult language to master, and we have to give credit for his marked improvements in the last few seasons.
Hughes started off by noting the win against the Vegas Golden Knights on New Year’s Eve was quite telling, as it featured a complete team effort in a comeback against a top club. In other words, they found a way to win, while earlier in the season they were finding ways to lose.
He was also quick to point out the trade for Alexandre Carrier stabilized a chaotic blue line, but that he wasn’t the only reason the Canadiens have improved since he made the deal. Several individual players were not achieving their potential earlier in the season according to Hughes.
“I don’t want to say it’s all Carrier,” he explained. “Some issues were resolved for individuals and from a team-first standpoint, but it’s also true that having five young defencemen without much experience, especially when things go wrong, having someone with experience helps them get through tough stretches.”
ON TOPIC: Montreal Canadiens Trade Analysis – Alexandre Carrier Trade Impact Goes Beyond The Expected
As for how he will tackle the issue of keeping important veterans in place while giving the prospects an opportunity to earn ice time, as per tradition, he covered both sides of the coin when explaining the team’s game plan.
“It’s always a balance for us, now and in the future,” said Hughes. “We have more young players coming. We’re excited about players like [Ivan] Demidov, and other great young players. It’s all about timing and balance. That’s our job.”
Demidov, in particular, was a player of interest throughout the whole press conference, especially since Hughes and Co. recently made their way to Russia to watch the top prospect play in person. Prior to the draft, only one member of the organization had the opportunity to be present in an arena to watch him play. We can safely assume that one member of the organization is Nick Bobrov.
“The goal was to see him play in person,” explained Hughes. “It’s a unique case, drafting a player fifth overall while there was only one of us that had seen him play. So, for us, it was a chance to check that box. We noticed his ice time had gone down for 10 straight games, I wanted to see where he was at, and meet him face to face. The draft goes by so fast. We communicated that despite his individual results during the difficult stretch of low ice time, he is very important to us. When you draft someone, they became part of the family. We believe a lot in the importance of communication. It was a good decision to go watch him play.
He would go on to suggest fans should not expect to see Demidov in Montreal this season, as his contract with SKA Saint Petersburg essentially runs until the Stanley Cup finals.
As for the geopolitical impact of his visit, Hughes dismissed the idea that the Habs were the only NHL team to take a trip to watch a player in the KHL.
“No regrets. I think we were criticized more on the political side,” he said. “For us, it was work. I can tell you that while we were there, there were several other NHL teams in Russia. I can’t talk about Philly and [Matvei] Michkov, but when he was in Russia there were two years left on his deal. Demidov’s deal is over this summer. So we have a decision to make about where his play is, and where he can fit in the lineup.”
Montreal Canadiens Trade Deadline Discussion
Yes, the Habs are playing quite well recently, but Hughes is not indulging in any delusions of grandeur.
“We have 22 games before the deadline, we have a lot to learn. We’re happy we’re playing well, but we have 40 games played, and we’re just one game above .500. I don’t want to celebrate, we haven’t accomplished anything. And we want to see how things shake up before the NHL trade deadline, and make a decision from there.”
He’s also not ready to declare the difficult nights are behind the team, which is still very much in the midst of a rebuild.
“It’s difficult to say the worst has passed,” he said. “I hope it has. We’re in a good stretch, but I don’t think we’re assuming we’ll win nine of the next 10 games. There are ebbs and flows each year. But I think we’re on the right track with the players we have and the players we have coming. We don’t want to be overconfident, and do like other teams. Like the Sabres coming close to the playoffs and then faltering, and Detroit too, but they’re getting better. We don’t want to be overconfident.”
On the topic of contract extensions, Jake Evans’ name inevitably popped up, but one of the few topics the general manager refuses to discuss is anything related to contract discussions. He quickly and predictably brushed aside any attempt to garner inside information about the current process.
MUST READ: Montreal Canadiens Analysis – The Jake Evans Trade And Contract Extension Situation
That led to a few reasonable questions about Juraj Slafkovsky, who was drafted first overall in 2022, and hasn’t exactly set the league on fire sine his arrival.
“I think he’s capable of doing more, and he knows it,” said Hughes. “Are we surprised? No. And I said it when we signed him that highs and lows are to be expected, development won’t be linear. He’s not alone in that situation. Since we’re here, there are a number of players who have undergone difficult situations, Josh Anderson, or Evans in 2022-23, Samuel Montembeault in the winter of 2022 had a hard time stopping a puck. And now he may be the starter for Team Canada. Such is life as a professional athlete. I have plenty of confidence in Juraj, but there’s work left to do, and he has to keep his head down and work hard.”
Kent Hughes On David Reinbacher and Montreal Canadiens Draft Picks
David Reinbacher, picked fifth overall in 2023 by the Montreal Canadiens, has yet to play a game this season, but the team is keeping him around in a bid to give him an opportunity to absorb some tricks of the trade that will allow him to adapt to life as a professional athlete.
“Long term nothing has changed, short term it’s difficult to miss a whole year.” said Hughes. “We saw it with Kirby, it took him a lot of work to get back to top form, playing up to his capabilities. It’s not easy. But long term, we have no worries at all. While he’s injured, we’re keeping him around the team so he can learn from all the off-ice activities, pre-scouts, team meetings. At the very least he’s understanding what coaches want, what they look for. He’s working with our staff, watching top players in the league, working on his comprehension of the game. It gives him a chance to learn from veterans how the room operates. It’s not a completely lost season, but obviously we’d want to have him on the ice, so we can’t gauge how well he’s developed since being drafted.”
And finally, seeing as the team seems to be turning a corner, and that draft picks tend to take a while to develop into useful NHL players, Hughes was quick to note that it is once again a topic that requires nuance, and that acquiring a draft pick doesn’t necessarily mean he will use it to pick a player, as it can be a key part of a trade.
“I don’t know how to balance it perfectly, to be honest, sometimes I feel like again, there’s a theory to it, then there’s a practical element to it. If we were going to be making trade and get futures, we might push them back even further at this point, whether we use those for a trade later, that’s probably the most likely scenario. Trading for futures, my answer is the same. We have 22 games to see where we are before we are ready to make any of those decisions.”
I like the methodical way he thinks. It is like a chess game, you have to anticipate the consequences of your actions.
I was thinking the same. Not to sound arrogant (he said, before preparing to sound arrogant), but I also like to present both sides of the coin when evaluating anything, so I’m a fan of his approach.
It’s not particularly exciting, but it’s much better than the alternatives.
Nuance is a lost art these days.
It’s such a relief to have such a sober minded man at the helm of this once great franchise. He understands that slow and steady wins the race and that we should never applaud the marathoner until the race is over. We’re in good hands with the tandem of HuGo.
Love the name man.
“Putting in the man-hours to study
the science of what you need.”
“Last week we put liquid paper on a bee….. and it died”
Did we just become best friends?!
Not sure I like these comments…
“We have 22 games before the deadline, we have a lot to learn. We’re happy we’re playing well, but we have 40 games played, and we’re just one game above .500. I don’t want to celebrate, we haven’t accomplished anything”.
How about just being happy and acknowledging this recent feat and getting players and fans excited? Geez, Hughes is the ringleader, and it almost sounds like he’s disappointed, and that he “prefers” The Tank to continue.
Not asking you to change any strategies going forward just yet. But at least just be happy the winning is starting – regardless of how things turn out this season. Beating the last 4 Cup champs IN A ROW is a big deal and should be recognized as such.
Not EVERY day or game has to have a perpetual ‘tank” cloud over it…
I miss the “good old days” when anything short of a cup was considered failure.
Now we’re supposed to celebrate a few mid-season victories? We can be happy that they are playing exciting hockey and winning games, but Hughes ain’t wrong. They’ve accomplished nothing so far and those 7th to 14th spots are tight. Here’s hoping the boys can keep the foot on the gas and play meaningful games in April.
Man what are you talking about?! Would you rather the gm be super emotional and ride the highs and lows of the team? It’s wayyyyy better that he’s even keeled and not acting like we’re suddenly contenders. He didn’t trash the team or anything, he was just honest that as an organization, we can’t blow these 25 good games out of proportion (just like we shouldn’t have blown the first 15 games out of proportion). Not to mention the fact that no pro athlete is celebrating a .500 record man.
How on earth did you come to the conclusion that he prefers the tank to continue? Or he’s keeping the tank cloud over the team?! In just the last few months, he acquired Patrick Laine, traded an underperforming D man for a legitimate top 4 defender in carrier, sent Primeau down because he was underperforming, and he’s literally the guy who set the expectations for the team to be in the mix. In no logical way whatsoever could that possibly be interpreted as preferring to tank. All those roster moves clearly scream “we want to be better” and being in the mix is OBVIOUSLY not a pro-tanking goal
And for the umpteenth time, rebuilding teams shouldn’t be expected to win BEFORE their prospects get to the nhl, and only slaf and Hutson have made it from Hughes drafts…. These things take time man. And if you see my response to you on the last article, you’ll see that the habs aren’t even at the halfway point of how long most teams take to rebuild
I have agreed with absolutely everything you have said in the last two articles. Thankfully it appears there we are among a significantly large group that understands the process. Habs were just in the Cup Finals a few yrs ago. I don’t care if was a fluke, it was one of my favorite playoff runs ever, a Covid Miracle and I became a fan in the early 70’s. Four yrs is nothing in a restructure. Having said that they look like they could be pretty good as early as next yr.
P.S, yes I picked a very good time to become a Hab fan…lol
NO…not asking to change the philosophy or be super emotional – just acknowledge that wins are wins and that’s why you play…to win the game. Especially against the last 4 cup winners! It DOES matter. Show SOME excitement! Not simply “we haven’t accomplished anything”.
I think that Hughes was being asked about the teams approach at the deadline when he said this. Perhaps he was just pointing out they had 20 games to go before they make any decisions and that a short spectacular stretch changes nothing.
Perhaps I’m misunderstanding his comments. On one hand he has said repeatedly that results don’t alter the strategy. Then he says we will have to see where we are before we make those decisions, which is contradictory?
I’d greatly encourage him to stay the course. Don’t make decisions for short term gain ( a run at the playoffs this season) at long term expense. We will have many many seasons of playoff hockey starting in April 2026, I suspect. If we make it sooner, wonderful. However, if we move the older guys at the TDL , it will likely hurt our chances but that yields greater long term benefits. Realistically, our rebuild is happening much faster than any of our contemporaries which is a direct result of the management team having a vision and plan then executing it very well.
The strategy is like a road trip in that one knows the destination. Any possible trade is like when or where to stop for rest and refreshment which can be and are flexible.
I don’t think it’s contradictory. Obviously I’m speculating here, buuuuut:
The strategy of focussing on the future will hold no matter what happens. He won’t be trading top picks or prospects for vets to go on a run. But perhaps who gets traded and what returns he’s looking for might change a tiny bit. Maybe he prefers to add a young player who can help right now if we’re, say, in one of the top 3 spots in the Atlantic as opposed to a WC spot. But if we’re just one of the 10 teams within 7 pts of each other in the WC race, maybe he’s more willing to take just picks. Maybe if we’re top 3, trading Matheson is off the table (unless there’s an amazing return) because we aren’t losing him for nothing at the end of the season and he could help in the playoffs. But if we’re in like 10th or something he’d be willing to listen more because he’ll likely be traded at some point before his contract expires, and he wouldn’t be needed for a run this year.
Again, just speculation, but these are just a couple ways his statements may not be contradictory.
Personally, I think he’s keeping an eye on the future, and will likely trade the vets on expiring contracts. I also think that’s the correct call.
Good points, well explained
Easy come, easy go (and vice versa). We were playing very poorly, and the sky was falling. We have a great stretch, and Stanley Cup here we come. We just as easily could fall back to stinking, just as well as we could continue playing great. Life, like the hockey season, is a roller coaster. Ups are followed by downs, which are followed by more ups and downs. Just enjoy the ride while it lasts.
Think that’s the first mention of winning the Cup this year I’ve heard from anyone which is strange as I know you’re in the very long rebuild camp.
As a fan, your comments make sense as we don’t truly have skin in the game, but that easy come easy go( translated as losing is inevitable therefore it’s acceptable) would not be accepted in the dressing room or the organization- it’s called culture and the Habs want and are building a winning culture. Never heard a player on a losing team talk about being pleased with their teams season, lots of ups and downs and we really enjoyed that winning week we had. All the superstars say winning is what’s most important to them. That’s what the Habs are trying to build. Hughes talked about it again yesterday and has been consistent in that messaging since he took the job.
Just wrote a huge response to you, but lost iit all when the page did the refresh and wipe out thing. I don’t have it in me to rewrite it all again. Gist was I don’t mean easy come, easy go as losing is acceptable (with a whole lot more for clarification).
I feel like Hughes and Gorton have still not shown their skills and talents to the fullest. The Carrier trade, as an example, was nothing short of brilliant. If anyone thinks the impact of Carrier on the Habs defence is just a lucky happenstance, and isn’t the calculated result of a thoroughly thought-out plan, then they are not paying attention. Going forward, there will be more moves that will confound and amaze. I expect Gorton and Hughes to take advantage of contracts with deferred income in order to address the Quebec tax issue. I expect HuGo to make trades that involve future high draft picks (in fact, Hughes said as much in the news conference). These types of moves will make Montreal a financially more attractive locale for UFAs, and will provide a resource for future trades/moves.
Look, there are many brilliant Presidents and GMs in the league. It’s just reassuring to know that we have a management team in Montreal that understands the team, the market, and has the skills and talents to restore this storied franchise to the elite status it once enjoyed.