Connect with us

Canadiens Analysis

How Lane Hutson’s Chaotic Approach Benefits The Canadiens

Published

on

Montreal Canadiens Lane Hutson

Montreal Canadiens prospect Lane Hutson certainly enjoyed a very encouraging start to his NHL career.

With points in back-to-back games, the creative blueliner has quickly erased many of the concerns held by fans and analysts alike.

Those concerns were not unfounded, mind you. Yes, much of the pre-emptive criticism sent Hutson’s way has been powered by empty rhetoric and an outdated approach to hockey, but despite his dominance in the NCAA, there were a few legitimate issues at play.

Answering Questions

For example, some were concerned Hutson would no longer be able to walk the blueline with the greatest of ease. I’ll admit, I was among them. Not that I doubted Hutson’s skill set, but it was, after all, his bread and butter from a production standpoint with Boston University.

Without the extra time and space afforded to him in the NCAA, there were chances one of Hutson’s greatest strengths could be mitigated significantly.

I assumed it would take a little while for Hutson to feel comfortable enough to attempt a blueline shimmy.

It didn’t take long for me to realize it wouldn’t be an issue.

From his very first shift, Hutson displayed the type of high-quality decision-making and impressive mobility that was apparent on any given night in the NCAA.

There was one play in particular that really drove the point home, and it happened to be the final goal scored by a member of the Montreal Canadiens in 2023-24.

It was rather fitting, as Hutson’s strong play resulted in a goal from the only player in the lineup younger than him: Juraj Slafkovsky.

 

Organized Chaos

To get a better idea of how effective his blueline shimmy can be, we need to take a closer at the impact of his dekes, jukes, and overall fluidity in the offensive zone.

I’ve used the term organized chaos in the past, though never to describe anything related to the Montreal Canadiens. The chaos part is common in Montreal, but you’d be hard-pressed to suggest it was anything more than a result of broken plays.

That’s no longer the case now that Hutson is the mix.

The first thing we notice is that Hutson forces opposing players to re-adjust their positions on the ice ad nauseam.

In the clip posted above, Hutson moves the puck well over a dozen times before he finally takes a shot. This gives Slafkovsky plenty of time to settle into a high-danger scoring area near the crease, but more importantly, it sows the seeds of chaos in the offensive zone.

If we break the play down into frames, we get a clearer view of what Hutson is trying to do.

David Perron was the Red Wings forward tasked with pressuring Hutson. He wisely backs off, as he understands the young player can drive to the net on a whim, as he did when he registered his first point in the NHL during just his second shift.

But by trying to limit how much ice Hutson has access to down low, Perron seals his own fate.

From the very get-go, he is already one step behind the 20-year-old defenceman. Hutson was already shifting to his right by the time Perron was halfway into his initial adjustment.

You’ll also note Red Wings goaltender James Reimer is dealing with a less-than-ideal situation when it comes to tracking the puck.

montreal canadiens hutson

 

The key to Hutson’s chaotic magic is adding layer upon layer of adjustments to the mix.

Every time he moves with the puck, five opposing players have to recalculate their approach, not to mention the opposing goaltender has no choice but to reset.

As you see in the frame below, by the time Hutson is heading back to his left, Perron is hardly midway through his second adjustment.

montreal canadiens hutson

 

By the third and fourth deke, Perron has had enough.

He realizes he’s being bag-skated by a defenceman who has spent less time in the NHL than he has spent in a penalty box in any given season.

At that exact moment, Hutson has already won the battle.

There is much more traffic between himself and the goal, while every member of the Red Wings has been pulled out of their original positions.

montreal canadiens hutson

Goalie Impact

What’s more, Reimer has had to reset half a dozen times. As you can see in the frame above, he’s peering over Slafkovsky’s left shoulder as Hutson prepares to shoot.

But if we fast-forward a few frames and change the angle, we can see that Reimer is well out of position by the time the puck nears the crease, as he is in the process of shifting to his right.

Montreal Canadiens Brass Tacks

Remember, a moving goaltender is a vulnerable goaltender.

And that’s what Hutson does best.

He takes mundane situations and adds talent, a spoonful of deception, and a generous heaping of mayhem while maintaining control of the play as the conductor of the chaotic orchestra.

25 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

25 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
habs4ever

What a good analysis Marc. Great camera shots to explain what I call the brand of hockey we will see next season called “Organized Chaos”.

morrisk

He’d be a top 10 pick in the 2022 re-draft.

He’s Subban all over again, but without taking the dumb penalties and making too many high risk decisions…all in an era where scoring is up.

He’s the Q. Hughes we passed up on in the 2018 draft.

By his third full year in the National, he’ll be a pt per game dman.

Greg

Subban was an excellent hitter as well, so while there can be some comparisons made, Subban was more well rounded, but I think Hutson is more talented.

Tyrone

I’ve taken all the hype about Hutson the past 2 seasons with a grain of salt because the Montreal hype machine can try to one up each other with effusive compliments towards a prospect in order to get clicks above all their peers, until the next thing you know, we have the second coming of Bobby Orr. A certain Matthias Norlinder comes to mind a few years ago. How quickly things can change. I drank the Kool-Aid on Norlinder, so I’ve learned my lesson. However, after watching Hutson do his thing in the last two games (albeit a small sample size, I know), I am certainly very excited to see what he can become. My biggest concern though is his slight frame. He could avoid dozens of hits with his moves, but all it takes is getting crunched once and he could be out for an extended period of time. It’s not like injuries haven’t derailed our seasons in the past already.

Greg

That’s hilarious. Nobody hyped Norlinder like this, EVER. Maybe his parents. Hutson isn’t as feeble as you seem to think. There are lots of small players now, and they aren’t any more injury prone than anyone else. Sure, he could get injured, but that’s the risk all the players take playing pro hockey.

Tyrone

Norlinder may not have had quite the hype as Hutson has had, but he was definitely hyped as the best D prospect we had in a long time, and was talked about as the guy to finally replace Markov. Because we have had so many great kids show up on D in the past few years, Norlinder is completely forgotten about, but he was “the guy” for a time. That’s what the hype machine does. A kid starts out as a good prospect. The next guy writing about him has to spice it up a bit in order to not just rehash what the other guy said, the guy after that does the same, and before you know it he’s a can’t miss stud. It’s happened a million times with prospects, and I’m sure it will continue to happen. It’s just the nature of the business. The onus is on the reader now to see through the hype and make their own judgments based on all the information as a whole and their own observations.

As for Hutson, I didn’t say he was “feeble”, but it’s absolutely plausible that a 230lb power forward bearing down on all 162lbs of the kid, and crushing him into the boards, could most certainly result in an injury. A busted collarbone is an obvious one in that scenario. Every player, no matter who they are, is going to take hits and abuse in the league, especially once playoffs begin. If Hutson develops into the player we think he can be, you don’t think smashing him into oblivion won’t be on the opposition game plan? It would be foolish to not think that. And, like I said in my original post, all it could take is getting caught just once to take him out.

morrisk

Your love affair with guys of size is overplayed and outdated. This is no longer 10-15 years ago when the Bruins and Kings “beat up” on everyone on the way to their playoff runs. There are fewer hits and fights now compared to then. The league has gotten smaller and faster (except goalies, who have gone the other way). There are now many highly talented Dmen who are 6 ft and under…and weigh under 200 lbs. Pronger, Chara, Hall Gill, etc, all gone. Dinosaurs.

Lane and Q. Hughes are carbon-copies…

How has Hughes done in his first 5 full seasons? Missed a total of 10 games in 5 seasons so far…none missed this season.

Tyrone

Not sure how my concern for the health of a 162lb Dman equates to a love affair for guys with size. It’s completely valid. It only takes ONE hit and he could be done for an extended period. He WILL get hit. It IS going to happen. I do believe that size is important for the playoff war, but not EVERY guy has to be a monster. Hutson provides a unique skill set that doesn’t exist in a 6’4” 230lb body. I’m acutely aware of that. He can (and always will) be smaller than the average Dman, and still be successful. I don’t doubt that. But he has to be durable enough in order to play. Quinn Hughes is 180lbs. Hutson is 162lbs. That 12lbs of muscle is a big difference on a small frame, and certainly contributes to his durability (as well as his supreme skill). His body can take a harder hit than Hutson’s. As Hutson matures, he too will put on more muscle, and will become more durable. My comment and concern is for the 162lb version that exists right now. How you have an issue with that is beyond me.

Tony

Alright wise guy, if 12 pounds of “Muscle” is the difference between Hughes taking hits, (as mentioned, 10 games missed in 5 seasons), what makes you so sure Hughes doesn’t have 12 pounds of non-muscle, and Lane’s BMI is actually higher?

If “Muscle” was such a factor as you portray it to be, then let’s hear your rhetoric about hot dog and belly roll meister..:

Phil Kessel is the NHL’s Ironman, the only player in league history to play at least 1,000 games in a row. His current streak is 1,064 — 75 more than Keith Yandle, whose record Kessel broke last season.

Yandle isn’t exactly built like Stuble either..

Your rhetoric is somewhat logical, but overblown. Quick, limber, small, flexible guys who know how to shift and stay away from vulnerable hit positions due to high IQ get injured a LOT LESS than DUFUS big bodied stiff jointed low hockey-IQ Dumbos.

Examples on both sides abound. Get off your high horse.

Tyrone

Not sure why you feel the need to get all aggressive over a sharing of opinions. I have an opinion. Someone else has a different one. What’s your problem? That’s exactly what these forums are for. There’s no high horse here.

Robin

I remember 4 years ago when 168 pound Jesperi Kotkaniemi took a viscous hit from Nikita Zadorov. Hutson is very elusive so I think he is less likely to get hit like this, but it is still a real source of concern.

morrisk

110% correct.

Tyrone

So you are agreeing with EXACTLY what I have been saying. Hutson is elusive, and can evade most hits, but at 162lbs, his size is a concern for the hits he can’t avoid. 🤷🏻‍♂️

morrisk

Right. And that’s how a smaller Scott Stevens basically ended Mr Mountain Man Eric Lindross’s career.

Hughes has been in the league for 5 full seasons now and gained that weight over that time. I’m sure he was 12 lbs lighter when he first entered the league.

Your argument (and love affair for size) for 12 lbs of muscle has no merit.

Tyrone

Scott Stevens vs Lindros is a laughable comparison to Hutson vs a Stevens/Lindros type of player. I’m not concerned that Hutson will get hurt getting hit by a Cole Caufield sized player, I’m concerned about him getting crushed by a huge guy. That is not a love affair for players with size, that’s just common sense. I have said nothing negative about Hutson. I’m thrilled he’s a part of our team. I’m concerned for his safety so that we can enjoy the success that his skill set will bring. You are arguing against a point I have not made. I’m done explaining it to you. Move on.

Dana

He is today the smallest player in the NHL and not even wearing Under Armour will insulate him from big body contact, lol. It’s not a new reality for him as this has always been a challenge, but as the guys he plays against get bigger and faster, the statistical odds of injury increase as you stated but I guess that’s universally true.

Doug Jarvis was small but an NHL iron man record holder and Denis Savard, Bossy, Naslund and hundreds of other small players have managed, many in the era when the game was brutally tough to play relatively injury free. Gretzky looked like a stick man out there…Morrisk compares him with other US small blue liners with similar toolboxes. Fox and Hughes are small by nhl blue line standards and played college hockey as did Makar, and Lane was as good as any of them at that level. And he never got hurt. I think they are good comparables

I see tremendous offensive potential based on his 2 games in the NHL plus his pedigree coming up the ranks. His skating and puck handling are excellent and his deftness is elite. Lots of holes in his game,, no rose colored glasses but the single most exciting blue line prospect since PK. I only used half my seat that last game against Detroit.

I’d play him third pairing with Xhekaj to help ensure contact he takes is clean and that the Tom Wilson’s of the league won’t be an issue. First pp minutes or 2nd for sure and OT deployment will get him to roughly 18 minutes a game I’d estimate and as he develops added size, he will move up. And playing against lesser competition as a 3rd pairing guy will offer a better chance to exploit weaknesses.

Regarding Norlinder, he was a third round pick after Stuble in the second round. He never demonstrated any offensive potential after his draft year and so tge enthusiasm was misplaced and not based on performance. Hutson has been producing super elite numbers for years so not a good comparable. I think he’s for real. Time will tell

Tyrone

Tried 3x to respond, but this damn site keeps refreshing and wiping it out. I’m done trying.

Dave

Hab fans were just looking for hope when came along. We only saw what he did in Europe. And then he had to make the transition to the AHL. The habs built up their defensive pipeline at the same time and so he got bypassed. He could still be a late bloomer though or part of a trade.

Hard Habits

I guess you didn’t watch the last Cup finals or taken a peak at Dallas lately.

Patrick

A Swedish reporter named Per Hogglund compared Norlinder to Niclas Lidstrom. You aren’t hilarious.

habbernack

IMO as much as possible he should play as a 5 man unit with Suzuki line. They play a like minded game. Perhaps Mailoux on RD

dan

one of the nicknames i saw posted for Hutson before he was drafted was “the Cobra” You can see it when he is weaving on the blue line – awesome! Can’t wait to see what he does once comfortable.

Dana

Great handle for him- the cobra and the sheriff reeking havoc from the blue line. If one doesn’t get you…

Hard Habits

He looked great at times but also looked bad at others. He has two primary assists but is also -2. Even if he gets 82 points and ends up a -82 to finish the season we’ll still be in the draft lottery.

IMO, he should not be rushed and needs time to develop in the AHL. He an Reinbacher should form next the Rockets season’s top defensive pairing.

Dave

A minus for suggesting that Hutson Would be a -82. He had no training camp and time to put on weight over the summer. And learn the system.Please tell me how many players finished -82 this season?