Connect with us

Montreal Canadiens

Martin St-Louis Contract Extension Points To Growth As Coach

Published

on

Montreal Canadiens coach St-Louis

Many eyebrows were raised when the Montreal Canadiens announced Martin St-Louis would take over as the team’s head coach.

With good reason, too.

St-Louis had little to no coaching experience, making him the exception in the NHL’s head coach recycling program.

And yet, there was one aspect of St-Louis’ character that was beyond reproach; his desire to win.

That desire manifested itself in the individual growth experienced by many of the young players in the lineup. Ask any member of the Canadiens and they will confirm St-Louis is a fantastic motivator.

“I would run through a wall for him,” explained prospect Owen Beck following last year’s training camp. “And I bet everyone else in the room would do the same.”

Given St-Louis essentially won every possible award as a player, you’d be hard-pressed to find a better example of a player who defied the odds. As a reminder, Calgary Flames general manager Craig Button placed St-Louis on waivers as one of his first major decisions with the franchise.

Going from a discarded asset to a player who won the Art Ross Trophy, the Conn Smythe Trophy, the Hart Trophy, and the Ted Lindsay Trophy in the same season is a story that sounds like a Hollywood script that would quickly be rejected since it holds no bearings in reality, especially when we consider St-Louis also captured a Stanley Cup that year.

But having an impressive career as a player is not enough to become a good head coach, as evidenced by Wayne Gretzky’s disappointing tenure as the coach of the Phoenix Coyotes.

St-Louis experienced many of the same issues in his first two seasons behind the bench.

And while the lack of talent has limited the team’s success, there have been signs that St-Louis is improving alongside his young core.

He quickly recognized the importance of placing players in a position to succeed, as he did when he promoted Juraj Slafkovsky to the top line.

He also improved many of the technical aspects involved in coaching, such as using a timeout when the momentum is squarely in the opponent’s corner. Or pulling the goaltender when it becomes clear the Habs were in for one of their regularly scheduled difficult games.

After all, like many of his players, St-Louis was learning on the job.

But when it comes down to it, there were very few examples of St-Louis improving the overall play of his team. Yes, they offered honest efforts on most nights, but their underlying numbers cratered from the moment St-Louis took over until about three months ago.

Montreal Canadiens Next Step

That’s when the Canadiens started seeing real improvements. They still couldn’t match the talent of Stanley Cup contending teams, but the possession metrics improved significantly, including their share of high-danger scoring opportunities.

Say what you will about data analysis, but there’s a direct correlation between stats such as shot share (CF%) and expected goal share (xGF%) and a team’s penchant for enjoying successful playoff runs.

Without those improvements, you’d be hard-pressed to suggest St-Louis and his coaching staff were anything but cheerleaders. But now that the results have started to improve, it must be said that the process put in place by the Laval native is certainly starting to pay off.

There’s still a lot of work left to be done. But once you combine his pedigree, his communication skills, and his growth as a coach, it becomes apparent why the Montreal Canadiens decided to exercise the option to extend his contract for two seasons.

“We love him,” explained Slafkovsky. “He’s just so smart with all his ideas. It’s crazy to see someone looking at the game that way and it’s great to have someone like that because it gives you new motivation every day.”

13 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Gillespie

The defense sucks. If Claude Julian had coached the team this year they would have had a chance to make the playoffs.when you have sub par management who misses on draft picks it is hard to gain in the standings. Example REINBACKER 5TH pick his season stats 1 goal 10 assists not exactly a blue chipper.

morrisk

Oy freakin’ vey !!!

DasLasagna

Tell me you have no idea about hockey, without telling me you have no idea about hockey.

Bev Seney

IfJulian was coaching the team he would have Suzuki playingvwing, he would have ruined Caufiled like he Therrien did KK and Slafkovsky would still booking for the puck playingb3rd and 4th line minutes. Our young kids on defence would be disorganized and Matheson would be benched because he made a mistake or caught up ice. None of the kids would have developed because he hates young players and benches them as soon as they make a bad play. He is not the coach for a young team. Destroys confidence.

Dana

Then how did Claude win the Stanley Cup? Career reg season record of 667 wins, 445 losses and a winning record in all 3 nhl teams he coached. Plus he won the Memorial cup coaching in major junior. Guess their confidence was destroyed after the championship…thanks for your insightful contribution, I now know what your initials mean…

Dana

Claude Julien was a successful coach but Marty is better. He’s a better strategist, communicator, developer and motivator. Claude had totally different situations so comparing winning percentages would not be relevant. So I disagree with that piece John

The defense has a lot of potential. Very young talented group but the team has been near the bottom of the nhl tge past several seasons in goals against so your criticism has some merit but in context of the future with the people signed, you’re wrong.

Management team has done as good a job since taking over as any other group in the league. Monster wins with Roy, Beck, Monahan (twice) hiring Marty as coach , Chariot, Slavkovsky over Wright and Cooley, Xhekaj and Hutson.

Nice wins with Dach and Newhook

Jury still deliberating on Reinbacher ( although , like you, I was massively disappointed when he was taken over a forward) and Mesar.

When you rebuild, there is pain. When you do it right, it doesn’t last as long and the future looks bright quickly.

Current rebuilding teams lije Buffalo Ottawa Detroit Anaheim, Sharks Coyotes Flyers and Bluejackets have all missed at least tge last 4 playoff seasons and none of them have a better path to cup contention than Montreal although Buffalo has a pretty impressive roster and pipeline in paper but it’s been 13 long years!!

This was/is a masterclass on how to go from last to contender in 5 years or less. Recognize it and enjoy it

Tyrone

My guess on the metrics improving would probably be that the skill of the team is catching up to what is necessary to execute St. Louis’s strategy correctly. Adding more offensively gifted players so we can score more is the main goal necessary to take the next step. I firmly believe we do not need to add a single other defenceman to the system. We have everything we need already, and they just need to gain experience and grow their game. Once that happens, we’ll be in the top third of the league.

morrisk

Yes, and to further add to that, if the D is solid and can score on its own, we don’t need to have the best forwards in the league. And a high scoring D makes the forwards better. Top 4 teams in the NHL with Dman points scored (200 and above) are the AVs, EDM, VAN, NYR…and look where they are in the standings today.

A Dmen tandem led by a top 4 of Lane-Rein + Guhle-Mailloux should be able to generate 200 pts a season at some point (probably 25-26).

They will draft at least one Dman in the draft, possibly two or three – as they should. But any significant trade or UFA signing, as well as the top 6 pick, will involve a forward.

Tyrone

What scares the crap out of me was seeing Sam Cosentino’s top 10 tonight. Celebrini #1, Demidov #3, and the other 6 in the top 8 were Dmen. There’s no chance either of those forwards will make it to #5 or 6, which means HuGo will select yet another Dman, unless we trade back and pick up another asset (which I don’t really want to do because we have quantity coming out the wazoo, and need quality). I was quite surprised to see no sign of Lindstrom or Eiserman in the top 10. I know he’s only 1 opinion, but generally there’s a little variance in everyone’s lists that include all the same players. No Eiserman or Lindstrom in the top 10 made we wonder what we’re in for at the draft.

Dana

Our management group has 0 intention of taking a defenseman in the draft and even said they recognize our great need to add offense up front.
I reviewed 5 different lists the past few days and they are all over the map. Don’t worry, we will add a premium offensive forward prospect with our first selection in this years draft. One of Lindstrom, Catton or Iginla will be available for us to select. I don’t think they will select Eiserman

Tyrone

I’d love to see us swing for the fences and package forward and defence prospects and draft picks in great quantity to San Jose (assuming they win the draft lottery). Their pipeline is virtually empty other than Will Smith. We could help them instantly stock up with one trade. Our quantity for their quality. And here’s another thought… if Celebrini is a no, how about Will Smith? HuGo coveted him and wanted him last season but lost out and took Reinbacher instead. He’s a year older now, which fits better with our timeline (although I have no doubts Celebrini would fit right in too).

Dana

It’s a beautiful concept Tyrone and you know how much in favor I am. Your point here that you never mentioned on the other is the need to manage the timeline, get to cup competitive as quickly as possible and of course I agree. Playoff bubble next year, fringe contender in 26 then contender for a decade. I’m not too worried when we are talking top end talent as they aren’t more than 1-2 years away from being legitimate contributors like Slav or Caufield was. Doesn’t mean they are in their prime right away but the team keeps getting stronger as the next wave of young talent grows into their primes.
My path was draft one of the 2 top 6 guys needed and trade for the other using our excesses. This works even better as the talent ceiling is higher your way and it solves our issue of having too many nhl capable defensemen and forward prospects that just won’t have opportunities with us.

Tyrone

Having our cake and eating it too. 🍰👌