Connect with us

Canadiens Analysis

How High Can Alex Newhook Fly with the Montreal Canadiens?

Published

on

Montreal Canadiens Alex Newhook Habs

So much of this season watching the Montreal Canadiens has been focusing on the top trio of Nick Suzuki, Cole Caufield, and Juraj Slafkovsky, or the veterans that are likely to be traded for futures as the Habs continue to rebuild.

Any leftover attention has been soaked up by the young defence core, or the emergence of Joshua Roy, and because of that, the spotlight hasn’t been on Alex Newhook as much as it should be.

Coming into Tuesday’s matchup against the Philadelphia Flyers, Newhook is sitting at 13 goals and 17 assists for 30 points in 50 games played. That’s obviously not blowing the doors off with production, but it’s three points away from his career high in points in 21 fewer games. That pace over 82 games would be 49 points, including 21 goals.

Considering all that’s been asked of Alex Newhook this season in terms of working in a new system with new linemates, and often at centre due to injuries to Kirby Dach and Christian Dvorak, along with trading Sean Monahan. There’s been more stability since he returned from injury, but it hasn’t been an easy road for Newhook so far. Still, he’s having the best season of his career.

Proving doubters wrong

When Kent Hughes traded for Alex Newhook right before the draft, I was confused. He didn’t seem to fit the needs of the team, and the price seemed pretty high. However, the 23-year-old spitfire from St. John’s, Newfoundland has taken a tough situation and made the most of it.

In his first season with the Montreal Canadiens, Newhook was put on a line with Dach and Slafkovsky that showed a lot of promise, only to have their hopes dashed four periods into the season when Dach sustained a freak knee injury that took him out for the year. Shifting to centre and tasked with holding the defensive bag for Slafkovsky and Josh Anderson did not work.

Marty St. Louis gave that line plenty of time to figure it out, but it didn’t mesh.

The line of Alex Newhook, Josh Anderson, and Juraj Slafkovsky produced worse results together than all three did apart.

Alex Newhook and  Juraj Slafkovsky have rehabilitated their seasons after this line was broken up.

On paper, I understand why St. Louis wanted to put that line together. Newhook and Anderson are both very fast, Slafkovsky and Anderson are big and can create a lot of forecheck pressure for Newhook to pounce on.

The problem was their playing styles didn’t fit together, and all three players ended up being worse together than they were apart.

At a glance, Newhook just treading water at 5-vs-5 isn’t that impressive, but we have to add some context here. As the straw that stirs the drink on the second line, Newhook does not have the advantage of playing with any of Suzuki, Caufield, or Slafkovsky. He’s also not playing top checkers every game, but as much as we should be rightfully crediting Joel Armia for his resurgent play this season, trying to run a second line with Armia as your best option at wing is not ideal in the NHL.

As an aside, if you’d like to put your hockey knowledge to the test, there is one website in particular you should visit. MightyTips knows all about online sports betting in Canada. Make sure to visit the site soon!

You Want Context? I’ll Give You Context!

At 5-vs-5, Newhook clearly looks most comfortable on the wing. Playing centre, the defensive game can get away from him at times, which makes Armia a very good partner for him overall because of Armia’s excellent defensive play this season. Newhook’s playmaking and speed also open up space for Armia, which has been a big factor in Armia tying his career-high mark for goals in a season with 16.

With Joshua Roy in the lineup, they formed a competitive line that stayed even against opponents in goals while slightly outplaying them in expected goals, per Natural Stat Trick. Keep in mind, that’s still with Newhook playing outside his natural position. Add in a high ankle sprain that caused him to miss 17 games, and it’s been a lot to battle through for the young Newfoundlander.

Those underlying numbers where Newhook is treading water are even more impressive when you realize that they’re a significant improvement of what he brought to the table in a smaller role on the Colorado Avalanche. Bigger minutes are an opportunity, but they also mean a tougher skate uphill as expectations and quality of opponents rise.

Dom Luszczyszyn's research at The Athletic reveals truer impacts of teammates and competition. Newhook sits dead centre in situational impact on his performance.

Alex Newhook sits dead centre in Dom Luszczyszyn’s breakdown on how teammates and opponents impact a player’s performance, meaning we can examine Newhook’s results against average expectations.

Dom Luszczyszyn’s research for The Athletic illustrates for us that Newhook isn’t thrown to the wolves in terms of his usage, nor is he hidden from danger. With an average level of difficulty to deal with on a below-average team, playing centre when he’s ideally a winger, with below-average linemates for the most part, I would argue his results are pretty good.

Projecting the future

Putting all this information together, what does it actually mean for Newhook as a future piece of the Montreal Canadiens? First and foremost, I think his production and overall play have put a lot of my reservations about the trade to bed. Newhook is clearly a talented NHL player who can contribute consistently. With that said, when I broke down what the Montreal Canadiens’ core looks like going forward, I had Newhook as a future fixture of the third line.

That isn’t an insult to Newhook, so much as a commentary on how I think this team is going to be built, which is to have a third line that attempts to score like a second line.

Even playing at centre and in a role that doesn’t look like a long-term fit, Newhook actually leads all Canadiens players aside from Roy in points per 60 minutes at 5-vs-5 with 2.05.

A player like Newhook who can score and make plays on a third line that can insulate him a little defensively seems like a recipe for success.

7 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Me2

We have people who’ve never played hockey now writing articles about hockey players.

They use a lot of ‘1’s and ‘0’s in a binary system in an attempt to demonstrate that despite never having played the game, they understand hockey better than those who have either played or coached or somehow been involved in it.

They use a lot of charts, graphs and other ways of displaying data.

They see players as interchangeable parts of a bigger numerical pie, that if you would put this player with that player in a certain situation, the results would be very good. At least in a theoretical sense.

And it’s not only writers. Hockey teams now have analytics departments where the numbers guys live in their bubble-wrapped world, where if a certain player doesn’t succeed in a certain situation, there is no attempt to coach that player to get better, that player is discarded.

Avoid any article where charts and graphs are prevalent. It’s the sign of a lazy mind who discounts what any individual could do is given proper support and coaching.

Dana

The underlying stats do contain the word lying, just saying. Newhook is a good nhl player. His greatest asset is speed. I haven’t looked him up on nhl edge but the eye test says he’s fast. I think you’re right that he is likely a third line player on a good team, best used as a winger. I think he could be developed as an effective pk guy as well. His usage is up over 3 minutes per game from previous career best this season, and he’s getting pretty good first pp opportunities, averaging over 3 minutes per game.

At the end of the day, he’s not a part of the untouchable “core” and is best suited as a complimentary piece. He has not reached his potential but I don’t see him producing more than 50ish points per season even if he plays with Roy and another good offensive player. That’s great production for a third line guy, fyi. He has the versatility and ability to move up and down the lineup. We didn’t overpay in the trade , it was market pricing. He’s been through a lot which often helps develop character and he’s coachable they say. I like this player and know he is fully commited to contribute whatever the team asks of him.

peter

How does anyone expect Montreal to do better with washed up players like Pearson and White in the lineup?

Jay

They won’t be here after this season. So you are getting your wish.

Bev Seney

They were fillins and will not be here next yr. Teams need these type of players for short term usage.

Mikeysl

I see newk on second line with dach and maybe roy

Last edited 19 days ago by Mikeysl
Marc

I love Newhook. We lack shooters and he is one. Still young he will improve.